- Received September 19, 2023
- Accepted October 30, 2023
- Publication December 21, 2023
- Visibility 1 Views
- Downloads 0 Downloads
- DOI 10.18231/j.ijpca.2023.048
-
CrossMark
- Citation
Antimicrobial efficacy of Tejpata
- Author Details:
-
Vikas Sharma *
-
Arti Heer
-
Shivangi Sharma
-
Sonam Sharma
Introduction
C. tamala, a moderate sized evergreen tree that attains a height of 8 m., a girth of 150 cm., is found in tropical / sub-tropical Himalayas, Khasi / Jaintia hills, Eastern Bengal and in Northern India. Leaves of the plant are commonly used for flavouring food and widely used in pharmaceutical preparations because of hypoglycemic, carminative and stimulant properties (Amma et al., 2013). [1] Traditionally, leaf extracts are used in colic and diarrhoeal preparations (Warrieret al., 1994). [2] The leaves have been reported to possess antidiabetic, antioxidant (Kar et al., 2003; Chakraborty and Das, 2010), [3], [4] antidiarrhoeal (Rao etal., 2008), [5] antihyperlipidemic (Dhulasavant et al., 2011), [6] antioxigenic (Semwalet al., 1999), [7] anti-inflammatory (Gambhireet al., 2009), [8] acaricidal (Reddy, 2009), hepatoprotective / gastroprotective (Selvam, 2010; Eswaran et al., 2010) [9], [10] properties. Antimicrobial activity of bark extracts (aqueous, methanol and chloroform) against bacterial and fungal clinical isolates like B. subtilis, S. aureus, E. coli, A. niger and C. albicans was determined. The result showed that methanolic extract had better antibacterial and antifungal activity. The most susceptible bacterial and fungal strains were B. subtilis and A. nigerrespectively. The methanolic extract showed MIC value of 2.5 mg/ml for B. subtilis and 5 mg/ml for A. niger (Varalakshmi et al., 2014). [11] In view of the above, in vitro antifungal and antibacterial potential of plant leaves has been investigated in the present research work.
Materials and Methods
Plant material and preparation of extract
C. tamala leaves were authenticated at site and enough quantity of fresh leaves were collected. The freshly collected leaveswere chopped, shade-dried and ground into powdered form. The methanolic extractwas prepared by percolating the dried ground plant material (100 g) with 99% methanol and then concentrating it to dryness under reduced pressure (Kandil et al., 1994) [12]
Determination of antibacterial activity
Qualitative analysis for evaluating antimicrobial activity of test material was carried out by agar–well diffusion method with modification. Two gram positive (Bacillus subtilis, MTCCC 2389and Staphylococcus aureus MTCC7443) and threegram negative (Micrococcus luteus, MTCC4821., Escherichia coli, MTCC2127., Klebsiella pneumoniae, MTCC7162) bacterial strains were used in the present study.20 mL of sterilized nutrient agar was inoculated with 100 µL of bacterial suspension (108 CFU/mL) and then poured on to sterilized petri plates. The agar plates were left to solidify at room temperature. A well of 6 mm diameter was aseptically bored into the agar plates and 20 µL of the essential oil (diluted with DMSO, 1:1) was added in each well. Chloramphenicol (10 µg) was used as a positive reference to determine the sensitivity of bacteria and DMSO as negative reference. The plates were kept at 4 0C for 2 h to allow the dispersion and then incubated at 37 0C for 24 h.
Determination of MIC by broth dilution method
Broth dilution technique was used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration of the test material against bacterial strains. One millilitre of nutrient broth was kept in each tube and autoclaved. The essential oil diluted with DMSO (1:1) was filtered with 0.22 μm filter disk before use and then added to each tube to keep the final concentration ranging from 62.5 μg/mL–2000 μg/mL. The test bacterial suspension was added into each tube to yield bacterial density of 106 CFU/mL and the inoculated tubes were incubated at 37 0C for 24 h. Tubes containing nutrient broth without essential oil served as positive control, whereas those without bacteria as negative control. After incubation, 50μL of 0.2 mg/mL p-iodonitrotetrazolium violet (INT) was added in each tube to indicate the bacterial growth. The tubes were again incubated for 30 min at 37 0C. Development of pink colour in the tube (due to reduction of dye) indicated the bacterial growth whereas tubes without colour indicated no active bacterial growth. The lowest concentration at which no bacterial growth was observed corresponds to the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). All the assays were performed in triplicate.
Determination of antifungal activity
The antifungal activity of the test samples was determined by Poisoned Food Technique (a type of agar dilution method) against three pathogenic fungal strains viz., Alternaria alternata, Curvularia lunata and Bipolaris specifera (procured from Division of Plant Pathology, SKUAST-Jammu). Different concentrations of test component were prepared in sterilized potato dextrose agar and poured in 9 cm petri plates. After this, 5 mm bit of test fungus was inoculated in the centre of the agar plate (mycelia surface of the bit was placed upside down) followed by incubation of petri plates at 26 0C. [13] The extension diameter (mm) of hyphae from the center to the dish was measured at 24 h interval, till the growth of fungus in the plate without test component (control) reached the edge of the plates. The experiment was repeated thrice and results were expressed as average of three replicates. Fungal growth diameter in each plate containing concentrations of test component was determined to calculate per cent growth inhibition.
The antifungal indices were calculated as:
Antifungal index (%) = (1-Da/Db) ×100
Da = Diameter of growth zone in the experiment dish (mm)
Db = Diameter of growth zone in the control (mm)
|
Extract |
Conc.(mg/mL) |
Phytopathogenic fungi |
||
|
Alternaria alternata |
Curvuleria lunata |
Bipolarisspecifera |
||
|
Growth Inhibition (%) |
||||
|
Methanolic |
0.5 |
28.75 |
26.25 |
25.8 |
|
1 |
43.75 |
37.5 |
48.75 |
|
|
2 |
65 |
56.25 |
69.5 |
|
|
IC50 |
1.34±0.012 |
1.35 ±0.013 |
1.2±0.018 |
|
|
Amphotericin B (positive control) |
Conc. (µg/mL) |
Growth Inhibition (%) |
||
|
10 |
48.5 |
46.20 |
50.75 |
|
|
20 |
65.00 |
61.00 |
71.50 |
|
|
40 |
83.60 |
81.60 |
85.69 |
|
|
IC50 |
9.5±0.1 |
12.1±0.4 |
5.7±0.2 |
Maximum growth inhibition by test material as indicated by IC50 value is given in bold numbers
|
Extract |
Conc. (mg/mL) |
Bacterial strains |
||||
|
Methanolic |
100 mg/mL (10µl) |
B. subtilis MTCC 2389 |
M. luteus MTCC 4821 |
S. aureus MTCC 7443 |
E. coli MTCC 2127 |
K. pneumoniae MTCC 7162 |
|
Zone of inhibition (mm) |
||||||
|
13±0.51 |
12±0.2 |
12±0.3 |
13±0.5 |
13±0.16 |
||
|
MIC |
62.5 µg/ml-2000 µg/ml |
250 |
500 |
500 |
500 |
250 |
|
Positive control CMP+ |
1mg/mL (10 µl) |
36±1.3 |
35.6±1.2 |
26.2± 0.9 |
35±1.1 |
35±1.3 |
|
Negative control DMSO |
10 µl |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Values indicating maximum zone of inhibition of test component are given in bold numbers
CMP+: Chloramphenicol; DMSO: Dimethylsulfoxide
Mark (-) indicates no activity
Results and Discussion
The extract of C. tamala showed moderate inhibition effect on fungal strains as the IC50 values were observed as 1.34 ± 0.012, 1.35 ± 0.013 and 1.2 ± 0.018 mg/mL for A. alternata, C. lunataand B. specifera respectively ([Table 1]). The antibacterial analysis of C. tamala leaves showed average activity against B. subtilis (13±0.51 mm), E.coli (13±0.5 mm), K. pneumoniae (13±0.16 mm). M. luteus (12±0.2mm) and S. aureus (12±0.3mm) were also inhibited ([Table 2]). The report “Antimicrobial Resistance: Global Report on Surveillance” notes that the resistance occurring across many different infectious agents and has special focus on antibiotic resistance in seven different bacteria responsible for common serious diseases such as sepsis, diarrhoea, pneumonia, urinary tract infections and some sexually transmitted diseases like gonorrhea. Pneumonia is responsible for 2nd highest number of deaths among children under five year age. So, screening of new complex antimicrobial agents poses a huge challenge and is required especially in the era of drug resistant microbial strains. Like animals, plants are also serious victims of pathogenic microorganism causing diseases. Fungal diseases presently destroy at least 125 million tonnes of the top five food crops - rice, wheat, maize, potato, soybean, each year, which could otherwise be used to feed those who do not get enough to eat. These crops are the major source of calories consumed by people. Rice blast, corn smut in maize, stem rust in wheat, soybean rust and late blight in potatoes are some diseases affecting productivity of the crops plants. Most frequently, chemicals / fungicides are used to control the diseases caused by plant pathogens. However, there is a serious problem in the effective use of these chemicals due to the development of resistance by the fungi (Zhang et al., 2009). [14] To overcome this problem, higher concentrations of these chemicals are used, but this increases the risk of high level of toxic residues in the products. This problem is a natural consequence of the adaption of infectious pathogens to antimicrobials used in several areas including medicine, food, animals, crop production and disinfectants in farms, hospital / households. This has forced the researchers to search new antimicrobial compounds from natural origin like medicinal plants which are more effective and less toxic to human health and environment.
To conclude, leaves of C. tamala were collected from Darhal, Rajouri, Jammuand tested against different fungal and bacterial strains. The methanolic extract from the leaf part of plantpossesses antimicrobial efficiency and forms a good basis for selection of this plant part for phytochemical and pharmacological analysis.
Source of Funding
None.
Conflict of Interest
None.
References
- KPP Amma, MP Rani. Comparative chemical composition and in vitro antioxidant activities of essential oil isolated from the leaves of Cinnamomum tamala and Pimenta dioica. Nat Prod Res 2013. [Google Scholar]
- PK Warrier, VPK Nambiar. . Indian Medicinal Plants- A compendium of 500 species 1994. [Google Scholar]
- U Chakraborty, H Das. Antidiabetic and antioxidant activities of Cinnamomum tamalaleaf extracts in Stz-treated diabetic rats. Glob J Biotechnol 2010. [Google Scholar]
- A Kar, BK Choudhary, NG Bandyopadhyay. Comparative evaluation of hypoglycaemic activity of some Indian medicinal plants in alloxan diabetic rats. J Ethnopharmacol 2003. [Google Scholar]
- CV Rao, M Vijayakumar, K Sairam, V Kumar. Antidiarrhoeal activity of the standardized extract of Cinnamomum tamala in experimental rats. J Nat Mrd 2008. [Google Scholar]
- V Dhulasavant, S Shinde. Antihyperlipidemic activity of Cinnamomum tamala on high cholesterol diet induced hyperlipidemia. Int Jo Pharm Life 2011. [Google Scholar]
- AD Semwal, GK Sharma, SS Arya. Pro-or antioxygenic activity of tejpat (Cinnamomum tamala) and red chilli (Capsicum annum) in sunflower oil. J Sci Food 1999. [Google Scholar]
- MN Gambhire, A Juvekar, SS Wankhede. Anti-inflammatory activity of aqueous extract of Cinnamomum tamalaleaves by in vivo and in vitro methods. J Pharm 2009. [Google Scholar]
- MB Eswaran, S Surendran, M Vijayakumar, SK Ojha, A Rawat, CV Rao. Gastroprotective activity of Cinnamomum tamala leaves on experimental gastric ulcers in rats. J Ethnopharmacol 2010. [Google Scholar]
- NT Selvam. Hepatoprotective activity of methanolic extract of Cinnamomum tamala(Nees) against paracetamol intoxicated swiss albino mice. Int J Pharma World Res 2010. [Google Scholar]
- B Varalakshmi, A Vijayaanand, T Karpagam, J Sugunabai, R Manikandan. In vitro antimicrobial and anticancer activity of Cinnamomum zeylanicum bark extracts. Int J Pharm Pharm 2014. [Google Scholar]
- O Kandil, NM Radwan, AB Hassan, A Amer, E Banna. Extracts and fractions of Thymus capitatus exhibit antimicrobial activities. J Ethnopharmacol 1994. [Google Scholar]
- GYM Reddy. Acaricidal activity of aqueous extracts from leaves and bark of tejpata and jatropha against two spotted spider mite. Karnataka Jo Agricul 2009. [Google Scholar]
- JW Zhang, SK Li, WJ Wu. The main chemical composition and in vitro antifungal activity of the essential oils of Ocimumbasilicum Linn. Molecules 2009. [Google Scholar]